Court Dismisses Jewish Groups Legal Claim Of ‘Anti-Semitism’ Against Leicester City Councils Boycott Of Israeli Goods In Protest Over Illegal Settlement Of Palestine

Royal Courts of Justice
The Court of Appeal found that the motion put before councillors was “temperate and legitimate”
BBC

“A legal bid challenging Leicester City Council’s boycott of some Israeli goods has been defeated.

The authority began boycotting goods from Israeli settlements in the West Bank after passing a motion in 2014, saying it opposed “continuing illegal occupation” of Palestinian territory.

This led to legal action from Jewish Human Rights Watch (JHRW), but the Court of Appeal dismissed their bid.

The council said the ruling “endorses” its approach.

JHRW had argued the council’s motion to boycott the goods until Israel “complies with international law and withdraws from Palestinian Occupied territories” was in breach of its obligations under Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010, which includes a requirement for authorities to “have due regard” to eliminating “discrimination, harassment [and] victimisation”.

It argued the motion “singled out Israel for different treatment” compared to other countries and “failed properly or sufficiently to consider its effect on the Jewish community”.

In its defence, the council argued it debated the motion before it was passed, and did comply with the requirements of the legislation.

A tourist photographs a sign painted on a wall in the West Bank biblical town of Bethlehem on 5 June 2015, calling to boycott Israeli products coming from Jewish settlements
Leicester City Council introduced a boycott of any produce originating from Israeli settlements in the West Bank

In dismissing the appeal, Lord Justice Sales said the motion recognised the state of Israel’s right to exist and only condemned “certain actions” of its government.

“The condemnation was in line with a respectable body of opinion, including the UK government, the United Nations General Assembly, the European Union and the International Court of Justice,” he said.

“The criticism made was temperate and legitimate.”

Kamal Adatia, barrister for the council, said it was a “landmark” ruling for all local authorities.

“It recognises their fundamental right to pass motions of this nature and makes it clear that they can, like Leicester, fully comply with their equality duties when doing so,” he said.

JHRW – which has not sought permission to appeal against the court’s ruling and was ordered to pay the council’s legal costs – described the decision as “an important victory against anti-Semitism and indeed all forms of discrimination” despite their appeal being defeated.

“The ruling brings a vital change in the law to the way in which councils can propose and discuss these controversial boycott motions,” a spokesman said.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s