Gay Church Of England Vicar Loses Discrimination Case Against Church After Having Job Offer Revoked For Being Married To Another Man

Jeremy Pemberton (right) and Laurence Cunnington
Jeremy Pemberton (right) married Laurence Cunnington in a civil ceremony in April 2014

BBC

“A gay clergyman stopped from becoming a hospital chaplain has lost his appeal over a discrimination claim against the Church of England.

Canon Jeremy Pemberton was prevented from officiating after marrying his partner in 2014.

He accused the Church of breaching the 2010 Equality Act, but lost an appeal against an employment tribunal in 2016.

The Court of Appeal, which heard Mr Pemberton’s case in January, has also now dismissed his case.

In a statement, Mr Pemberton said: “The Church of England has established through this process that it can continue to discriminate legally against some LGBT people in relation to their employment, even where that employment is not within the boundaries of the church’s jurisdiction.

“This will seem to most people in the UK today an extraordinary result, and not one that will help commend the claims of Christ to the nation.”

The Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham said it was “pleased” the court upheld the decision.

Laurence Cunnington and Jeremy Pemberton
Laurence Cunnington and Jeremy Pemberton married in a civil ceremony in April 2014

Mr Pemberton had been working as a chaplain in a Lincolnshire hospital when an offer to work as a bereavement manager at Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust was withdrawn when his licence was revoked.

He claimed the Right Reverend Richard Inwood, then the acting Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham, discriminated against him because of his homosexuality, but the bishop argued it was same-sex marriage that went against the church’s beliefs.

No further appeal

In January Sean Jones QC, representing Mr Pemberton, told the court the bishop’s decisions were wrong because the Church of England does not have a fixed rule on same-sex marriage among members of the clergy.

He argued members in civil partnerships that are “effectively indistinguishable” from marriage were allowed to continue practising.

But Thomas Linden QC, in documents submitted to the court, said Mr Pemberton had “publicly flouted” the Church’s position on marriage.

Mr Pemberton said he had agreed he would not appeal further and the church would not pursue him for legal costs.”

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s